Claims

After implementation of the SBS scheme, course withdrawal rates in Human Body 1 dropped for both internal and external students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · design r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Withdrawal rates in HB1 fell from 21% to 20% for internal students and from 28% to 22% for external students after SBS was introduced. → Thalluri 2014

Evidence

Thalluri 2014

Thalluri, Jyothi; O'Flaherty, Jackie A.; and Shepherd, Paul L. (2014). Classmate peer-coaching: "A Study Buddy Support scheme". Journal of Peer Learning, 7, 92-104. http://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol7/iss1/8

q2 · i? · design · r2

Before-and-after comparison of withdrawal rates in the HB1 course across internal and external modes, reported descriptively with no statistical test. The external rate dropped from 28% to 22% and the internal rate from 21% to 20%.

"Before the introduction of the SBS, the percentage withdrawal rates in HB1 were 21% for internal students and 28% for external (24% overall). After the implementation of SBS, the withdrawal rates dropped to 20% for internals and 22% for externals (average 21%)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.