Claims

At-risk first-year Bioscience students who participated in the Study Buddy Support scheme passed at a higher rate (72%) than at-risk students who did not participate (49%)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Of at-risk students in the SBS scheme, 72% passed, while only 49% of at-risk non-participants passed, across 2012 and 2013 cohorts. → Thalluri 2014

Evidence

Thalluri 2014

Thalluri, Jyothi; O'Flaherty, Jackie A.; and Shepherd, Paul L. (2014). Classmate peer-coaching: "A Study Buddy Support scheme". Journal of Peer Learning, 7, 92-104. http://ro.uow.edu.au/ajpl/vol7/iss1/8

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Comparison of final grades of 2012 and 2013 at-risk students depending on whether they took up SBS assistance. Table 2 reports 141 SBS participants with a 72% pass rate and 131 non-participants with 49%; participation was self-selected, so the comparison is not randomized.

"Of those in the SBS scheme, 72% passed, while only 49% of those not participating passed."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.