Claims

Students across all genders perceive scientific citizenship positively

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Students across all genders perceived scientific citizenship positively, with male students scoring higher on proactive exploration, problem solving, and future prospects, and female students leading on affective engagement and science participation. → Okada 2024

Evidence

Okada 2024

Okada, A., Sherborne, T., Panselinas, G., & Kolionis, G. (2024). AI in Education: A Cross-National Study of Open Schooling Using the CARE-KNOW-DO Framework for Sustainable Development Goals. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3960164/v1

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Analysis of the gender-comparison bar chart (Fig. 7); the article states "Students across all genders perceive scientic citizenship positively" and describes component-level differences by gender.

"Students across all genders perceive scientic citizenship positively. The chart shows that male students score higher on proactive exploration, problem solving, and future prospects, while female students lead on affective engagement and science participation."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.