Students across all genders perceive scientific citizenship positively¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2029: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students across all genders perceived scientific citizenship positively, with male students scoring higher on proactive exploration, problem solving, and future prospects, and female students leading on affective engagement and science participation. → Okada 2024
Evidence¶
Okada 2024¶
Okada, A., Sherborne, T., Panselinas, G., & Kolionis, G. (2024). AI in Education: A Cross-National Study of Open Schooling Using the CARE-KNOW-DO Framework for Sustainable Development Goals. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-3960164/v1
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Analysis of the gender-comparison bar chart (Fig. 7); the article states "Students across all genders perceive scientic citizenship positively" and describes component-level differences by gender.
"Students across all genders perceive scientic citizenship positively. The chart shows that male students score higher on proactive exploration, problem solving, and future prospects, while female students lead on affective engagement and science participation."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Gender — predictor: outcomes differ by group: a gap reflecting circumstances and treatment, not a cause
Related Claims¶
- Learning from a male model is more enjoyable and leads to greater willingness to receive similar instruction for male students than for female students — related
- Observing a male model enhances perceived competence more from pretest to posttest than observing a female model, for both male and female observers — related
- Model-observer gender combination affects mental effort invested during example study: male students invest less effort with a male model, female students more effort with a male model — related
- Male faculty report modestly higher self-perceived GenAI knowledge than female faculty in TK and TPK, with small effect sizes — related
- Male secondary students report higher self-efficacy than female students after learning from video modeling examples, without higher performance — related
- Male students report significantly higher overall technological self-efficacy than female students (p = 0.001) — related
- Learners perceived male PALs more positively and recalled more with them than with female PALs, reflecting gender stereotypes — related
- No statistically significant gender differences in perceived learning outcomes across any dimension among higher vocational students — related
- Gender does not significantly affect students' creative thinking in problem solving — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.