Students in the SCL group experience a greater sense of burden than those in the LBL group¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Students in the SCL group feel a greater sense of burden than those in the LBL group (RR 2.59, 95% CI 1.82–3.69). → Lou Jicheng 2025
Evidence¶
Lou Jicheng 2025¶
Lou Jicheng, Guo Feng. (2025). Comparing the seminar-case learning and lecture-based learning models in medical education: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07041-w
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Meta-analysis of 3 RCTs reporting burden of learning. Found students in the SCL group "felt a greater sense of burden than their counterparts in the LBL group", with a relative risk of "RR 2.59".
"The meta-analysis results revealed that students in the SCL group felt a greater sense of burden than their counterparts in the LBL group (RR 2.59, 95% CI 1.82–3.69; p < 0.00001; I2 = 46%)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Students in the SCL group report greater satisfaction than those in the LBL group — related
- The SCL model improves teaching effects including learning interest, self-learning ability, and clinical thinking ability compared to LBL — related
- The SCL model improves theoretical knowledge scores compared to LBL in medical education — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.