Claims

Students in the SCL group report greater satisfaction than those in the LBL group

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Students in the SCL group are more satisfied than those in the LBL group (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.14–1.69). → Lou Jicheng 2025

Evidence

Lou Jicheng 2025

Lou Jicheng, Guo Feng. (2025). Comparing the seminar-case learning and lecture-based learning models in medical education: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07041-w

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Meta-analysis of 5 RCTs reporting student satisfaction. Found students in the SCL group "were more satisfied than were those in the LBL group", with a relative risk of "RR 1.38".

"The results revealed that students in the SCL group were more satisfied than were those in the LBL group (RR 1.38, 95% CI 1.14–1.69; p < 0.001; I2 = 64%)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.