Claims

Only 20% of simulation-based trauma training studies targeted medical students during undergraduate training

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Of 35 included studies, only 7 focused on medical students, showing a scarcity of undergraduate-targeted simulation-based trauma training. → Larraga-García 2022

Evidence

Larraga-García 2022

Larraga-García, B., Quintana-Díaz, M., & Gutiérrez, Á. (2022). Simulation-Based Education in Trauma Management: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013546

q2 · i? · review · r2

Scoping review synthesis of 35 included articles; the review reports that "Only 7 out of the 35 studies focused on medical students" and that only 20% delivered training specifically for medical students during undergraduate academic training. Audience sizes varied from 18 to 444 people.

"Only 7 out of the 35 studies focused on medical students, as shown in Figure 2a. From these seven studies, one of them focused on paramedic students and another training course focused on both medical students and doctors together."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.