Claims

High-fidelity mannequins were the most used simulation method in trauma training courses (51.4%)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 18 of 35 training courses (51.4%) used high-fidelity mannequins, more than any other simulation method. → Larraga-García 2022

Evidence

Larraga-García 2022

Larraga-García, B., Quintana-Díaz, M., & Gutiérrez, Á. (2022). Simulation-Based Education in Trauma Management: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013546

q2 · i? · review · r2

Scoping review analysis of simulation methods across the 35 included courses; the review reports "18 of them (51.4% of the training courses) used high-fidelity mannequins". Other methods included virtual reality (7 studies), standardized patients (3), skill stations (3), simulation cards (1), and desktop virtual settings (2).

"With respect to the simulation methods used during the simulation-based training courses analyzed, 18 of them (51.4% of the training courses) used high-fidelity mannequins during the trainings, as shown in Figure 2b, whereas the rest used any other methods."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.