Claims

Trauma simulation training focused more on technical than non-technical skills

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? 18 of 35 courses focused on technical skills, only 2 on non-technical skills, and 8 on both. → Larraga-García 2022

Evidence

Larraga-García 2022

Larraga-García, B., Quintana-Díaz, M., & Gutiérrez, Á. (2022). Simulation-Based Education in Trauma Management: A Scoping Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192013546

q2 · i? · review · r2

Scoping review analysis of skills trained across the 35 courses; the review reports 18 courses focused on technical skills, "Only two of the studies included in this scoping review focused on non-technical skills", and eight focused on both types.

"Regarding the skills that the trainees gathered after the trainings, 18 of them (51.4% of the training courses) focused on training technical skills considering the application of correct protocols to attend to trauma patients, as well as specific treatments and techniques for trauma treatments."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.