Claims

Effects of collaboration scripts combined with heuristic worked examples on mathematical argumentation skills depend on prior knowledge and working-memory capacity, consistent with a Matthew Effect

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? In a factorial study of 108 students in a two-week preparatory course for prospective mathematics university students, fading or not and ordering of types of scaffolding were manipulated, with sensitivity to prior knowledge and working-memory capacity. → Carolyn P. Rosé 2017

Evidence

Carolyn P. Rosé 2017

Carolyn P. Rosé, Sten Ludvigsen, Nancy Law, Ulrike Cress & Gerry Stahl. (2017). Divisive or facilitative: The two faces of technology in CSCL. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 12:215–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-017-9265-7

q2 · i? · review · r1

The editorial summarizes the third paper on post-secondary mathematics argumentation skills (MAS): a large empirical investigation involving 108 students with a rigorous statistical analysis sensitive to prior knowledge and working-memory capacity. Both dialogic and dialectic notions of MAS inform the work.

"The paper follows a hypothesis-testing paradigm where a factorial design is employed to tease apart the separate and joint effects of the two manipulations of interest, namely fading or not and ordering of types of scaffolding."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id script-worked-example-fading-matthew-effect
title Effects of collaboration scripts combined with heuristic worked examples on mathematical argumentation skills depend on prior knowledge and working-memory capacity, consistent with a Matthew Effect
description Effects of collaboration scripts combined with heuristic worked examples on mathematical argumentation skills depend on prior knowledge and working-memory capacity, consistent with a Matthew Effect
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2017
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — carolyn-p-rosé-2017

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.