Claims

SDL readiness among nurses shows no significant correlation with age, gender, academic status, or marital status

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2030: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Nurses' SDL readiness shows no significant correlations with age, gender, academic status, or marital status. → Berger-Estilita 2025

Evidence

Berger-Estilita 2025

Berger-Estilita, Joana; Linda, Krista; Gogollari, Artemisa; Schmitz, Felix; Elfering, Achim; Guttormsen, Sissel (2025). Self-directed learning in health professions: A mixed-methods systematic review of the literature. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320530

q2 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

The review reports, citing Ghiyasvandian and Chakkaravarthy, that nurses showed "overall high levels of readiness for SDL without significant correlations with age, gender, academic status, or marital status."

"Ghiyasvandian [27] and Chakkaravarthy [24] highlighted nurses’ overall high levels of readiness for SDL without significant correlations with age, gender, academic status, or marital status."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.