Age, gender, developmental status, SES, and sample region do not significantly moderate the inhibitory control–mathematical ability correlation¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr?·q3
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? None of the demographic moderators (age, gender, developmental status, SES, sample region) significantly moderated the correlation. → Zhu 2025
Evidence¶
Zhu 2025¶
Zhu, X., Tang, Y., Lu, J., Song, M., Yang, C., & Zhao, X. (2025). Inhibitory Control and Mathematical Ability in Elementary School Children: A Preregistered Meta-Analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 37(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09976-w
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r?
Bivariate moderator analyses of demographic characteristics in the three-level meta-analysis found no significant moderation (all ps ≥ 0.125). Table 1 reports, e.g., mean age moderator F(1, 217) = 2.37, p = 0.125; gender F(1, 231) = 0.12, p = 0.727; developmental status F(1, 237) = 0.87, p = 0.353; SES F(2, 127) = 1.17, p = 0.315; region F(3, 231) = 0.01, p = 0.999.
"we found no significant moderation effect of age, gender, developmental status, SES and sample region, ps ≥ 0.125 (see online SM Appendix D Table S2 for detailed results)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Executive Function — moderator: an instructional effect differs with it
Related Claims¶
- Inhibitory control is moderately positively correlated with mathematical ability in elementary school children (r = 0.19) — related
- Exploratory moderation analyses found no significant moderators (age, gender, SES, baseline self-control, baseline life events) of the life events–self-control relation — related
- Demographic moderators (child gender, parent gender, ethnicity, sample type, socio-economic status) show limited moderating effects on the self-efficacy–partnership association — related
- Intervention effects of SRI did not differ by student background or ability variables — related
- No coded study characteristics moderated the emotion–political learning associations in Bayesian regularized meta-analysis — related
- Most study characteristics (publication year, mean age, sampling, target language, L2 major, proficiency, measure, mode) do not significantly moderate the gender gap — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
no-demographic-moderation-inhibitory-control-math |
title |
Age, gender, developmental status, SES, and sample region do not significantly moderate the inhibitory control–mathematical ability correlation |
description |
Age, gender, developmental status, SES, and sample region do not significantly moderate the inhibitory control–mathematical ability correlation |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2025 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — zhu-2025 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.