Self-efficacy has a significant positive effect on motivation among undergraduates using generative AI¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? SE significantly and positively predicts MOV (β = 0.78, p < .001), supporting H8. → Hui Zhao & Huijuan Gu 2026
Evidence¶
Hui Zhao & Huijuan Gu 2026¶
Hui Zhao & Huijuan Gu. (2026). Thoughtless use of generative artificial intelligence and college students’ self-directed learning: a multi-group SEM analysis of gender differences. Scientific Reports. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-54337-y
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Bootstrapped path coefficient from the PLS-SEM structural model (Table 6). The SE→MOV path was the largest positive coefficient printed, with "β = 0.78, t = 23.56, p < .001".
"Finally, SE exerted a significant positive effect on MOV (β = 0.78, t = 23.56, p < .001), thus supporting Hypothesis H8."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Learners' task-specific self-efficacy beliefs predict whether they initiate, persist through, and recover from difficulty on academic tasks. — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- The effects of thoughtless GenAI use on motivation, self-efficacy, and self-directed learning differ significantly by gender — related
- Self-efficacy and motivation partially mediate the negative relationship between thoughtless GenAI use and self-directed learning, including a sequential SE→MOV pathway — related
- Self-efficacy and motivation positively predict self-directed learning, with motivation the strongest direct predictor — related
- Thoughtless use of generative AI significantly and negatively predicts both self-efficacy and motivation — related
- Thoughtless use of generative AI is negatively associated with undergraduates' self-directed learning in a cross-sectional survey model (β = −0.42) — related
- Reflective AI use predicts programming self-efficacy and engagement, while PSE does not predict engagement (survey SEM) — related
- Academic self-efficacy was not significantly associated with final test performance — related
- The TUGA, motivation, and self-efficacy jointly explain 75.3% of the variance in undergraduates’ self-directed learning — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
se-positive-effect-mov |
title |
Self-efficacy has a significant positive effect on motivation among undergraduates using generative AI |
description |
Self-efficacy has a significant positive effect on motivation among undergraduates using generative AI |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-10 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — hui-zhao-huijuan-gu-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.