Claims

STEM education combined with a mastery learning approach produced the largest effect on learning achievement (g = 2.09)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3 · i3 large
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i3 Among the teaching-learning approaches examined, STEM with mastery learning had the largest effect size on learning achievement (g = 2.09, p < 0.01). → Mustafa Çevik 2022

Evidence

Mustafa Çevik 2022

Mustafa Çevik, Büşra Bakioğlu. (2022). The Effect of STEM Education Integrated into Teaching-Learning Approaches (SEITLA) on Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis Study. International Journal of Progressive Education, 18(2). https://doi.org/10.29329/ijpe.2022.431.8

q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r2

Subgroup analysis in the random-effects model (Table 5) of SEITLA studies. The mastery learning subgroup (1 study, 58 effect-size participants) yielded "the largest effect size on learning achievement" at g = 2.09, significant at p < 0.01.

"it was determined that the study in which STEM was used together with a mastery learning approach had the largest effect size on learning achievement (g ¼ 2.09, p <0.01)"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.