Claims

The self-determined motivational profile is related to the best level of achievement in physical education

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2008 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Path analysis showed that students with the self-determined motivational profile achieved at the best level compared with the other profiles. → Julie Boiché 2008

Evidence

Julie Boiché 2008

Julie Boiché, Philippe Sarrazin, Frederick Grouzet, Luc Pelletier, Julien Chanal. (2008). Students’ Motivational Profiles and Achievement Outcomes in Physical Education. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100 (3), pp.688-701. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.688

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Path analysis across the two studies linked profile membership to achievement criteria (performance, effort, grade). The article reports that "Path analysis showed that the self-determined profile was related to the best level of achievement." No effect size is printed.

"Path analysis showed that the self-determined profile was related to the best level of achievement."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.