Children aged 8–11 with higher parent-rated self-regulation show more proactive response slowing on a stop-signal anticipation task¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In a cross-sectional cohort of 640 children, higher EATQ-R self-regulation scores were significantly associated with more proactive response slowing, regardless of sex. → Pas P. 2021
Evidence¶
Pas P. 2021¶
Pas P., Hulshoff Pol H.E., Raemaekers M., Vink M. (2021). Self-regulation in the pre-adolescent brain. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101012
q2 · i? · associational · r3
Regression analysis in the YOUth cohort linking the EATQ-R inhibitory-control scale to task behavior found "a significant relation between self-regulation and proactive response slowing on the task, F(1, 533) = 6.48, p = 0.01". No effect size was printed. There was no main effect of self-regulation on SSRT (F(1, 536) = 0.43, p = 0.51).
"However, we did find a significant relation between self-regulation and proactive response slowing on the task, F(1, 533) = 6.48, p = 0.01, regardless of sex F(1, 533) = 0.54, p = 0.46 (Fig. 2)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Self-Regulation — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Pre-adolescent children already exhibit proactive inhibitory control, slowing responses as stop-signal probability increases — related
- Reactive inhibition speed and accuracy improve with age between 8 and 11 years, while proactive response slowing does not increase with age — related
- Higher self-regulation in pre-adolescent children is associated with stronger right mid frontal cortex activation during proactive inhibition — related
- Functional coupling development during inhibition is sex-specific: striatal-motor coupling increases with age in girls, frontostriatal coupling increases with age in boys — related
- Children aged 8–11 show significant activation in frontal-striatal-parietal regions during proactive inhibition and striatal activation during reactive inhibition, similar to regions reported in adults — related
- Self-regulation scores correlate with functional coupling between the right striatum and left motor cortex during reactive inhibition, but not frontostriatal coupling during proactive inhibition — related
- Parent-reported inhibitory control (EATQ-R) shows no detectable growth from early to middle adolescence — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
self-regulation-proactive-response-slowing-children |
title |
Children aged 8–11 with higher parent-rated self-regulation show more proactive response slowing on a stop-signal anticipation task |
description |
Children aged 8–11 with higher parent-rated self-regulation show more proactive response slowing on a stop-signal anticipation task |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — pas-p-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.