Claims

Functional coupling development during inhibition is sex-specific: striatal-motor coupling increases with age in girls, frontostriatal coupling increases with age in boys

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q2 · i1–i2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2026: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i1 During reactive inhibition, coupling between the right striatum and left motor cortex increased with age specifically for girls (r = 0.17), not boys (r = 0.01). → Pas P. 2021 q2 i2 During proactive inhibition, coupling between the right striatum and mid frontal cortex increased with age specifically for boys (r = 0.23), not girls (r = −0.01). → Pas P. 2021 (2)

Evidence

Pas P. 2021

Pas P., Hulshoff Pol H.E., Raemaekers M., Vink M. (2021). Self-regulation in the pre-adolescent brain. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101012

q2 · i1 · associational · r2

PPI analysis of reactive inhibition found an age-by-sex interaction (F(1, 636) = 4.66, p = 0.03); post-hoc regressions showed the age association "was specifically present for girls F(1, 361) = 10.52, p < 0.01 (r = 0.17)". Boys with mid pubertal characteristics showed more coupling than boys in pre- and early puberty (t(205) = 2.95, p < 0.01).

"A post-hoc regression analysis revealed that this association with age, was specifically present for girls F(1, 361) = 10.52, p < 0.01 (r = 0.17), but not for boys F(1, 277) = 0.01, p = 0.92 (r = 0.01); (Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons at p < 0.05/2 = 0.025)."

Pas P. 2021 (2)

Pas P., Hulshoff Pol H.E., Raemaekers M., Vink M. (2021). Self-regulation in the pre-adolescent brain. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcn.2021.101012

q2 · i2 · associational · r2

PPI analysis of proactive inhibition found an age-by-sex interaction (F(1, 636) = 10.26, p < 0.001); the age association "was specifically present for boys F(1, 277) = 15.56, p < 0.001 (r = 0.23)". No coupling difference by pubertal stage was found for either sex.

"A post-hoc regression analysis revealed that the association with age was specifically present for boys F(1, 277) = 15.56, p < 0.001 (r = 0.23), but not for girls F(1, 361) = 0.03, p = 0.85 (r = −0.01); (Bonferroni corrected for multiple comparisons at p < 0.05/2 = 0.025)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id sex-specific-inhibition-coupling-development
title Functional coupling development during inhibition is sex-specific: striatal-motor coupling increases with age in girls, frontostriatal coupling increases with age in boys
description Functional coupling development during inhibition is sex-specific: striatal-motor coupling increases with age in girls, frontostriatal coupling increases with age in boys
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2021
recheck_by 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — pas-p-2021, pas-p-2021-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.