When marks and tests are modeled as separate latent variables with cross-lagged effects between them, effects of self-concept on achievement completely disappear¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 1995 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? In the most complex model (Model 3c), no significant path remained from self-concept to later test performance or marks, suggesting a pure skill-development model. → Helmke 1995
Evidence¶
Helmke 1995¶
Helmke, A., & van Aken, M. A. G. (1995). The causal ordering of academic achievement and self-concept of ability during elementary school: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(4), 624-637. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.87.4.624
q3 · i? · associational · r2
LISREL Model 3c (697 students, 3 waves) treated marks and tests as separate latent variables and allowed cross-lagged paths between them; the article states that in Figure 4 "there is not a single significant path leading from self-concept to either later test performance or marks."
"However, when effects of marks on tests and vice versa were allowed, the effects of self-concept on achievement completely disappeared, suggesting a pure skill-development model."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Marks show a stronger impact on later self-concept than test performance from third to fourth grade — related
- Reciprocal effects are robust to time-invariant confounders, but the French lagged self-concept effect did not survive the lag2 carryover stress test — reports the opposite
- Simulation evidence shows RI-CLPM estimates are biased when the true model is a CLPM with lag-2 effects, and fit statistics cannot decide between the two — related
- Adding lag-2 paths to CLPMs substantially improves fit and provides stronger controls for preexisting differences, positioning extended CLPMs as viable alternatives to RI-CLPMs — related
- The reciprocal effects are robust to alternative models attributing them to latent confounding or residual error (RI-LTVC, STARTS) — related
- The extended REM was robust to several alternative modeling specifications proposed by Sorjonen et al. — related
- Reanalyses of simulated and PALMA data provide converging support for the extended reciprocal effects model, including an effect of academic self-concept on achievement — reports the opposite
- Across basic and extended RI-CLPMs and CLPMs of five-wave secondary-school data, math self-concept and achievement show consistent reciprocal (bidirectional) directional ordering — reports the opposite
- In elementary school, achievement predicts later self-concept of ability but prior self-concept does not significantly predict later achievement when achievement is modeled with both marks and tests integrated — reports the opposite
- Models using a single achievement indicator (marks or tests alone) yield a reciprocal self-concept–achievement pattern, unlike integrated models — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
separate-indicators-self-concept-effects-disappear |
title |
When marks and tests are modeled as separate latent variables with cross-lagged effects between them, effects of self-concept on achievement completely disappear |
description |
When marks and tests are modeled as separate latent variables with cross-lagged effects between them, effects of self-concept on achievement completely disappear |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1995 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — helmke-1995 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.