Claims

Boys scored significantly higher than girls on IQ in the sample (p=.001)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? T-tests controlling for sex showed statistically significant differences in IQ (p=.001), with boys scoring 112.74 and girls 101.94. → Alberto Quilez-Robres 2020

Evidence

Alberto Quilez-Robres 2020

Alberto Quilez-Robres, Alejandro González-Andrade, Zaira Ortega and Sandra Santiago-Ramajo. (2020). Intelligence Quotient, short-term memory and study habits as academic achievement predictors of elementary school: a follow-up study. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101020

q3 · i? · associational · r2

T-tests on the baseline sample of 74 pupils (39 male/35 female) to control for sex. The article reports a significant IQ difference (p=.001) with boys at 112.74 and girls at 101.94; no effect size is printed.

"T-tests were performed to control for sex. The results show statistically significant differences in the IQ variable (p=.001) (boys= 112.74 and girls=101.94)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id sex-difference-iq-boys-higher-sample
title Boys scored significantly higher than girls on IQ in the sample (p=.001)
description Boys scored significantly higher than girls on IQ in the sample (p=.001)
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2020
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — alberto-quilez-robres-2020

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.