Claims

Boys outperform girls on the final two-digit number test in this sample

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Gender was related to final math test scores (β=0.23, t(113)=2.45, p=0.016), with boys (M=8.40, SD=2.39) outperforming girls (M=7.27, SD=2.73). → Margina Ruiter & Sofie Loyens & Fred Paas 2015

Evidence

Margina Ruiter & Sofie Loyens & Fred Paas 2015

Margina Ruiter & Sofie Loyens & Fred Paas. (2015). Watch Your Step Children! Learning Two-Digit Numbers Through Mirror-Based Observation of Self-Initiated Body Movements. Educ Psychol Rev (2015) 27:457–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9324-4

q3 · i? · associational · r1

Secondary correlational analysis of age and gender across all conditions in the randomized experiment; only gender was related to test scores. The unstandardised β is not a standardised effect size, so no magnitude is coded.

"Only gender was related to the final math test scores, β=0.23, t(113)=2.45, p=0.016, with boys ( M=8.40, SD=2.39), outperforming girls (M=7.27, SD=2.73)"

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id gender-gap-final-math-test-first-graders
title Boys outperform girls on the final two-digit number test in this sample
description Boys outperform girls on the final two-digit number test in this sample
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2015
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — margina-ruiter-sofie-loyens-fred-paas-2015

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.