A shared epistemic object let a team with substantial off-task time (UrPo) still complete a successful co-invention¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? UrPo had nearly as high a proportion of off-task activity as the unsuccessful Plant team yet completed a successful project because the shared epistemic object enabled quick regrouping. → Riikonen 2020
Evidence¶
Riikonen 2020¶
Riikonen, S., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2020). Bringing maker practices to school: tracing discursive and materially mediated aspects of student teams' collaborative making processes. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09330-6
q2 · i? · design · r2
Quantitative comparison from the coded-video proportions (Table 3 shows UrPo off-task at 29.1% versus Plant 35.7%), interpreted against the rug visualizations; no effect size is printed.
"although the UrPo team had nearly as high a proportion of off-task activities, they still managed to carry out a successful project; pursuit of shared epistemic object enabled to group to quickly regroup to do their work after periods of some team members'off task activity."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Student teams differed markedly in their application of computer engineering and product design practices and in their share of off-task activity — related
- The editorial reports that successful collaborative making teams resolved coordination challenges through intertwined social-discursive and materially mediated processes — a broader claim this one bears on
- Anchoring collaboration in a shared epistemic object distinguished the successful co-invention teams from the unsuccessful one — a broader claim this one bears on
- Off-task activity appeared more common in the larger six-to-seven-member teams than in the compact teams, though not in every larger team — related
- Teacher-introduced redirection that simplified a team's epistemic object was associated with a decline in that team's knowledge-creation activity — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
shared-object-regrouping-after-off-task |
title |
A shared epistemic object let a team with substantial off-task time (UrPo) still complete a successful co-invention |
description |
A shared epistemic object let a team with substantial off-task time (UrPo) still complete a successful co-invention |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — riikonen-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.