Anchoring collaboration in a shared epistemic object distinguished the successful co-invention teams from the unsuccessful one¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The four successful teams pursued and refined a shared epistemic object through sketching, prototyping and experimentation, while the Plant team never formed a comprehensive epistemic object and its efforts remained scattered. → Riikonen 2020
Evidence¶
Riikonen 2020¶
Riikonen, S., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2020). Bringing maker practices to school: tracing discursive and materially mediated aspects of student teams' collaborative making processes. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-020-09330-6
q2 · i? · design · r2
Cross-case comparison of the five teams at the intermediate analysis level, which combined Process-Rug results, field notes and artifact documentation; "both success and collaboration within teams resulted when the team members shared the same envisioned epistemic object."
"In contrast with the successful teams, the Plant team did not work out a comprehensive epistemic object and, consequently, their efforts remained scattered and the invention did not advance."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Embodied design practices of sketching and experimenting co-occurred with the application of product design, computer engineering, and science practices, while model making was more often followed by it — related
- The editorial reports that successful collaborative making teams resolved coordination challenges through intertwined social-discursive and materially mediated processes — a broader claim this one bears on
- Successful seventh-grade co-invention teams spent a much larger share of their embodied making actions on model making and experimenting than the unsuccessful team — related
- A shared epistemic object let a team with substantial off-task time (UrPo) still complete a successful co-invention — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Teacher-introduced redirection that simplified a team's epistemic object was associated with a decline in that team's knowledge-creation activity — related
- Embodied hands-on practices remain important learning activities in AI-era design education — related
- Sensorimotor action supports learning when it makes concept-relevant relations easier to process — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
shared-epistemic-object-anchors-collaborative-making |
title |
Anchoring collaboration in a shared epistemic object distinguished the successful co-invention teams from the unsuccessful one |
description |
Anchoring collaboration in a shared epistemic object distinguished the successful co-invention teams from the unsuccessful one |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2020 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — riikonen-2020 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.