Teams with similar cohesive perceptions report higher task cohesion scores than teams with different perceptions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Teams with similar cohesive perceptions report higher task cohesion scores, and teams with different perceptions report lower scores, across all four survey items. → Zamecnik 2024
Evidence¶
Zamecnik 2024¶
Zamecnik, A., Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Grossmann, G., Ladjal, D., Pardo, A. (2024). The perceptions of task cohesion in collaborative learning teams. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09424-5
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Survey analysis of 194 WIL teams at Weeks 1 and 3 using four Carless and De Paola adapted items, weighted Kappa grouping at 0.33, and Kruskal–Wallis testing: significant differences (p < 0.0001) for each of the four items. Team teams with similar perceptions reported, on average, higher task cohesion scores. Survey reliability was "alpha 0.93 (Week 1) and 0.94 (Week 3)".
"Looking at the average cohe- sion scores of the two groups, we see that teams with similar perceptions reported, on aver- age, higher task cohesion scores than teams with different team cohesion perceptions."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Feedback engagement is the main activity distinguishing perception groups, with divergent-perception teams interacting less with feedback content — related
- Temporal network motif frequencies differ significantly between perception groups, with dyadic motifs characterising divergent-perception teams and triadic motifs aligned teams — related
- Week 3 performance differs by perception-transition group, with Aligned teams increasing and Multifaceted teams decreasing in scores — related
- Temporal network motifs show promise as a proxy indicator of task cohesion in WIL environments when combined with survey data — related
- Perceived task cohesion strength relates to team performance in collaborative learning teams — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
similar-cohesive-perceptions-higher-task-cohesion-scores |
title |
Teams with similar cohesive perceptions report higher task cohesion scores than teams with different perceptions |
description |
Teams with similar cohesive perceptions report higher task cohesion scores than teams with different perceptions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — zamecnik-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.