Week 3 performance differs by perception-transition group, with Aligned teams increasing and Multifaceted teams decreasing in scores¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Week 3 performance differs significantly across the four perception-transition groups, and teams maintaining similar perceptions increased performance while teams maintaining different perceptions decreased it. → Zamecnik 2024

Evidence¶

Zamecnik 2024¶

Zamecnik, A., Kovanović, V., Joksimović, S., Grossmann, G., Ladjal, D., Pardo, A. (2024). The perceptions of task cohesion in collaborative learning teams. Intern. J. Comput.-Support. Collab. Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09424-5

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Performance analysis of mentor- and client-assessed deliverable scores (0.00–1.00) for 194 teams. Aligned rose from 0.84 to 0.89; Multifaceted fell from 0.84 to 0.77. Week 1 scores were approximately the same across groups; the Kruskal–Wallis test found significant Week 3 differences between the four perception groups.

"The results indicated that teams who maintained similar cohesive per- ceptions increased their performance, and teams who maintained different cohesive per- ceptions decreased their performance."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Feedback engagement is the main activity distinguishing perception groups, with divergent-perception teams interacting less with feedback content — related
• Teams with similar cohesive perceptions report higher task cohesion scores than teams with different perceptions — related
• Perceived task cohesion strength relates to team performance in collaborative learning teams — related
• Temporal network motif frequencies differ significantly between perception groups, with dyadic motifs characterising divergent-perception teams and triadic motifs aligned teams — related
• Teams whose perception of who uses more AI reversed between t1 and t3 achieved lower scores than teams with stable perceptions — related
• Greater early-project misalignment in partners' perceptions of each other's AI use is associated with lower final project scores — related
• Perception alignment improves mainly in the early weeks and does not consistently decrease through the project — related
• Temporal network motifs show promise as a proxy indicator of task cohesion in WIL environments when combined with survey data — related