Claims

Perceived task cohesion strength relates to team performance in collaborative learning teams

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A survey-based measure of task cohesion was put into relation with collaborative learning team members' interactions, and relations were found between perceived task cohesion strength and team performance. → Baker 2024

Evidence

Baker 2024

Baker, M., Reimann, P. (2024). CSCL: a learning and collaboration science?. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09433-4

q2 · i? · theoretical · r2

The editorial summarises Zamecnik et al. (2024)'s study of the perception of task cohesion in collaborative learning teams, building on Festinger's two-dimensional concept of cohesion (task and social); no effect size or statistics are printed here.

"The study puts into relation learning team members' interactions with a survey-based measure of task cohesion and finds relations between the strength of perceived task cohesion and team performance."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id task-cohesion-relates-team-performance
title Perceived task cohesion strength relates to team performance in collaborative learning teams
description Perceived task cohesion strength relates to team performance in collaborative learning teams
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — baker-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.