Perceived task cohesion strength relates to team performance in collaborative learning teams¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? A survey-based measure of task cohesion was put into relation with collaborative learning team members' interactions, and relations were found between perceived task cohesion strength and team performance. → Baker 2024
Evidence¶
Baker 2024¶
Baker, M., Reimann, P. (2024). CSCL: a learning and collaboration science?. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-024-09433-4
q2 · i? · theoretical · r2
The editorial summarises Zamecnik et al. (2024)'s study of the perception of task cohesion in collaborative learning teams, building on Festinger's two-dimensional concept of cohesion (task and social); no effect size or statistics are printed here.
"The study puts into relation learning team members' interactions with a survey-based measure of task cohesion and finds relations between the strength of perceived task cohesion and team performance."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Teams with similar cohesive perceptions report higher task cohesion scores than teams with different perceptions — related
- Week 3 performance differs by perception-transition group, with Aligned teams increasing and Multifaceted teams decreasing in scores — related
- Temporal network motifs show promise as a proxy indicator of task cohesion in WIL environments when combined with survey data — related
- Homogeneous problem perceptions predict better regulation outcomes in collaborative groups — related
- In-game avoidable mistakes in TEAMUP are significantly and markedly explained by team cohesiveness, not by team structure variables — related
- Temporal network motif frequencies differ significantly between perception groups, with dyadic motifs characterising divergent-perception teams and triadic motifs aligned teams — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
task-cohesion-relates-team-performance |
title |
Perceived task cohesion strength relates to team performance in collaborative learning teams |
description |
Perceived task cohesion strength relates to team performance in collaborative learning teams |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — baker-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.