Claims

In a qualitative pilot with 10 speech-language pathology graduate students, most felt the Simucase assessment cases lacked authenticity because they included too few behavioral modifications

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q1 · n=10
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? In two focus groups with 10 first- and second-semester SLP graduate students at one Midwestern university, most participants reported a lack of behavioral modifications in the Simucase child speech-and-language assessment cases, which they felt was not authentic to younger clients, who may present with behavioral concerns in person. → Elliott 2021

Evidence

Elliott 2021

Elliott, H., & Brumbaugh, K. (2021). Student Perceptions of a Simulated Clinical Experience: A Pilot Study. Teaching and Learning in Communication Sciences & Disorders, 5(1), Article 7. https://doi.org/10.30707/TLCSD5.1.1624982519.538001

q1 · qualitative phenomenological pilot (two focus groups, no comparison) · i? · no effect size reported · n=10 · qualitative · r3

Focus-group theme from a qualitative phenomenological pilot: two focus groups (four and six students) of first- and second-semester graduate students at a rural public graduate school in the Midwest, after an eight-week summer 2019 clinical practicum in child speech and language assessment run on Simucase. The finding is participants' perception of the cases, not a measurement of them, and one participant said they preferred the cases with real people to the simulated or computer-voice ones. The case history portion produced the most frustration and nonspecific clicking. The authors link this to Ellis's (2017) finding on wanting more real-life occurrences.

"Another finding was that most participants reported that there was a lack of behavioral modifications incorporated into the cases. Participants indicated this was not authentic, as many younger clients may present with behavioral concerns in person."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id simucase-lacks-behavioral-authenticity
title In a qualitative pilot with 10 speech-language pathology graduate students, most felt the Simucase assessment cases lacked authenticity because they included too few behavioral modifications
description In a qualitative pilot with 10 speech-language pathology graduate students, most felt the Simucase assessment cases lacked authenticity because they included too few behavioral modifications
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2021
recheck_by 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — elliott-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.