Claims

Sorjonen et al.'s (2023) simulation lacked a temporal structure and therefore cannot justify replacing autoregressive effects with covariances in the LCSM

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoretical r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The 2023 simulation data were generated without temporal structure, so they do not demonstrate that AR effects distort LCSM parameters; they show only that dynamic parameters are uninterpretable for non-temporal data. → Núñez-Regueiro 2026

Evidence

Núñez-Regueiro 2026

Núñez-Regueiro, F., Marsh, H. W., Pekrun, R., Lüdtke, O., & Guo, J. (2026). On Model Interpretability and Time-Reversal Testing in Analyses of Reciprocal Effects: Clarifying Modeling Issues in Sorjonen et al.'s (2025a, 2025b) Commentaries. Educational Psychology Review, 38(80). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10179-8

q2 · i? · theoretical · r3

Design inspection of the Sorjonen et al. (2023) simulation: X1 and X2 were independently generated from the same latent variable, so the data "lacked a temporal structure" and did not model the change processes at stake in LCSM methodology.

"inspection of their simulation design reveals that their simulated data did not reflect change scores (nor an LCSM), because it lacked a temporal structure"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id simulation-2023-lacked-temporal-structure-invalid-for-lcsm-justification
title Sorjonen et al.'s (2023) simulation lacked a temporal structure and therefore cannot justify replacing autoregressive effects with covariances in the LCSM
description Sorjonen et al.'s (2023) simulation lacked a temporal structure and therefore cannot justify replacing autoregressive effects with covariances in the LCSM
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2026
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — núñez-regueiro-2026

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.