Simulation's impact on student reflection remains inconclusive due to limited evidence¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Only one study addressed reflection, reporting a positive effect on nursing students, leaving the overall impact of simulation on reflection inconclusive. → Loubbairi S 2025
Evidence¶
Loubbairi S 2025¶
Loubbairi S, Lahlou L, Amechghal A, Nassik H. (2025). The impact of simulation on the development of critical thinking and reflection among nursing and medical students: a systematic review. Korean Journal of Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.3946/kjme.2025.334
q2 · i? · review · r3
Systematic review (PRISMA) found that "only one study addressed this theme and reported a positive effect on nursing students," leading the authors to conclude the impact on reflection remains inconclusive.
"For student reflection, only one study addressed this theme and reported a positive effect on nursing students."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Simulation-based education improves nursing students' clinical decision-making, judgment, and self-confidence — related
- The effect of high-fidelity simulation on practising nurses' self-confidence is inconclusive, varying by study design — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.