Simulation-based training improves global rating scores in laparoscopic surgery¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Global assessment scores increased in the intervention group as compared to the non-trained group in some studies, though not all studies found statistical significance. → Vanderbilt Allison A. 2015

Evidence¶

Vanderbilt Allison A. 2015¶

Vanderbilt Allison A., Grover Amelia C., Pastis Nicholas J., Feldman Moshe, Granados Deborah Diaz, Murithi Lydia K., Mainous Arch G. III. (2015). Randomized Controlled Trials: A Systematic Review of Laparoscopic Surgery and Simulation-Based Training. Global Journal of Health Science. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4493882/

q3 · i? · review · r2

Review of 7 studies using global rating scales including OSATS and GOALS, with one study reporting "global assessment scores increased and their standard deviation decreased in the intervention group as compared to the non-trained group (P =.004)."

"A different study reported that global assessment scores increased and their standard deviation decreased in the intervention group as compared to the non-trained group (P =.004)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• AR-assisted training improves OSATS Global scores in novice laparoscopic learners — related
• Virtual reality training improves economy-of-movement and error global rating scores compared with no additional training in one RCT — related
• Virtual reality training improves OSATS scores compared with no additional training for junior trainees in laparoscopic cholecystectomy — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Simulation-based training reduces intraoperative errors in laparoscopic surgery — related