In studies investigating mastery and performance aims simultaneously, mastery aims show tighter bonds with autonomous than controlled reasons, while performance aims are more equidistant¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesisr1·q3·i3large
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i3 Across five simultaneous-investigation studies (1832 participants), mastery aims correlated r = 0.57 with autonomous reasons versus r = 0.18 with controlled reasons; performance-aim associations were more equidistant (r = 0.43 autonomous; r = 0.34 controlled). → Janke 2024
Evidence¶
Janke 2024¶
Janke, S. (2024). Dynamic or Static Goal Regulation: Implications of Weak and Strong Bonds Between Autonomous/Controlled Reasons and Aims for Achievement Goal Striving. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09968-w
q3 · i3 · quant-synthesis · r1
Scoping meta-analytic pooling of the five studies (1832 participants) that measured mastery and performance aims simultaneously, printed in Table 3. Mastery aims showed "tighter associations" with autonomous reasons (r = 0.57) than controlled reasons (r = 0.18); performance-aim associations were more equidistant (r = 0.43 vs. r = 0.34).
"A scoping meta-analytic inspection over the five studies with 1832 participants once again shows tighter associations between mastery aims and autonomous reasons (r = 0.57, 95% CI [0.41, 0.73], Q(4) = 67.98, p < 0.001, I2 = 96.59%) then with controlled reasons ( r = 0.18, 95% CI [0.03, 0.32], Q(4) = 31.78, p < 0.001, I2 = 89.88%)."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Achievement Goal Orientation — predictor: learners who differ on it differ in outcomes
Related Claims¶
- Autonomous reasons are more prominent than controlled reasons for goal striving regardless of aim type — reports the opposite
- Across goal-complex studies, autonomous reasons are strongly associated with achievement goal aims (pooled r = 0.54) — a broader claim this one bears on
- Mastery aims are strongly bound to autonomous reasons and only weakly to controlled reasons — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Performance aims are ambiguously aligned, tied nearly equally to autonomous and controlled reasons — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
simultaneous-aims-studies-mastery-autonomous-tighter |
title |
In studies investigating mastery and performance aims simultaneously, mastery aims show tighter bonds with autonomous than controlled reasons, while performance aims are more equidistant |
description |
In studies investigating mastery and performance aims simultaneously, mastery aims show tighter bonds with autonomous than controlled reasons, while performance aims are more equidistant |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-22 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — janke-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.