The SKT-SRL correlates moderately with self-reported SRL strategy usage (convergent validity)¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · design r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The SKT-SRL total score correlated substantially with the SRL questionnaire total (r = 0.32 in the pilot), with convergent subscale correlations higher than divergent ones. → Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich 2024 q2 i? In Validation Study 1, moderate convergent correlations appeared for the metacognitive and motivational subscales but not the cognitive subscale. → Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich 2024 (2)

Evidence¶

Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich 2024¶

Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich, Jörn R. Sparfeldt, Franziska Perels. (2024). Knowing how to learn: development and validation of the strategy knowledge test for self-regulated learning (SKT-SRL) for college students. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09379-w

q2 · i? · design · r3

Pilot study (N = 143 teacher education students) correlating SKT-SRL scores with a 53-item SRL questionnaire; total-scale correlation was r = 0.32, with convergent subscale correlations (0.18–0.33) numerically exceeding divergent ones.

"The overall (total) SKT-SRL and SRL questionnaire scores correlated substantially (r = 0.32) while the correlations between the convergent subscales (referring to the same component; 0.18 < r < 0.33) were numerically higher than the correlations between the divergent subscales"

Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich 2024 (2)¶

Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich, Jörn R. Sparfeldt, Franziska Perels. (2024). Knowing how to learn: development and validation of the strategy knowledge test for self-regulated learning (SKT-SRL) for college students. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09379-w

q2 · i? · design · r3

Validation Study 1 (N = 99) replicated convergent validity for metacognitive and motivational subscales; the cognitive subscale did not show the expected convergent correlation, possibly influenced by the questionnaire's low cognitive-subscale reliability (α = 0.57).

"As hypothesized, we found moderate convergent correlations between the metacognitive and motivation subscales of the SKT-SRL and the SRL questionnaire, but not with regard to the cognitive subscale."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The SKT-SRL shows low, mostly non-significant correlations with SRL microanalysis (online measure) — related
• The only significant cross-method correlation within one SRL component is motivation assessed by questionnaire and closed-ended microanalytic questions — related
• SKT-SRL scores did not correlate significantly with high school GPA in the pilot and validation studies — related