The only significant cross-method correlation within one SRL component is motivation assessed by questionnaire and closed-ended microanalytic questions¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Across assessment methods within one component, no correlations were found except motivation assessed by questionnaire and closed-ended microanalytic questions. → Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich 2021
Evidence¶
Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich 2021¶
Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich, Marie Weißenfels, Lea Russer, Franziska Perels. (2021). Multimethod assessment of self-regulated learning in college students: different methods for different components? Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09533-2
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Monotrait-heteromethod correlational analysis (Table 7) in 70 college students; the questionnaire–closed-ended microanalysis motivation correlation is printed as 0.29*. The discussion attributes this to both measures using four-point rating scales.
"No correlations were found except for the motivational component assessed by questionnaire and closed-ended microanalytic questions."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- SRL components show moderate correlations within one assessment level but no correlations across different assessment methods within one component — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- The SKT-SRL shows low, mostly non-significant correlations with SRL microanalysis (online measure) — related
- A task-specific questionnaire built item-by-item from a think-aloud coding taxonomy correlated r=.51 with think-aloud protocols, higher than the -.07 to .42 regularly reported — related
- The SKT-SRL correlates moderately with self-reported SRL strategy usage (convergent validity) — related
- Whether an SRL component correlates with GPA depends on how it is assessed: cognition via a strategy knowledge test, motivation via questionnaire, metacognition via an open-ended microanalytic question — related
- Of 289 studies on motivation regulation, approximately three quarters examined university students, used cross-sectional designs, and relied on self-report questionnaires — related
- SKT-SRL scores did not correlate significantly with high school GPA in the pilot and validation studies — related
- Research on teachers' SRL knowledge is methodologically dominated by cross-sectional quantitative designs with non-standardized measures — related
- Measurement methods moderate SRL–EF correlations, with indirect measures correlating higher than direct measures — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
motivation-questionnaire-microanalysis-only-cross-method-link |
title |
The only significant cross-method correlation within one SRL component is motivation assessed by questionnaire and closed-ended microanalytic questions |
description |
The only significant cross-method correlation within one SRL component is motivation assessed by questionnaire and closed-ended microanalytic questions |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
recheck_by |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — laura-dörrenbächer-ulrich-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.