The SKT-SRL shows low, mostly non-significant correlations with SRL microanalysis (online measure)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · designr3·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2027: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? SKT-SRL scores correlated low and non-significantly with microanalysis subscales, except a moderate correlation between the SKT-SRL motivational subscale and the microanalysis metacognitive subscale. → Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich 2024
Evidence¶
Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich 2024¶
Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich, Jörn R. Sparfeldt, Franziska Perels. (2024). Knowing how to learn: development and validation of the strategy knowledge test for self-regulated learning (SKT-SRL) for college students. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09379-w
q2 · i? · design · r3
Validation Study 1 (N = 99) compared the offline SKT-SRL with an online microanalytic assessment during a text-learning task on Sepak Takraw, coded by two trained raters with high interrater agreement (ICC mean 0.78–0.87).
"the analyses resulted in low and non-significant correlations of the SKT-SRL with the microanalysis subscales (with the exception of a moderate correlation between the SKT-SRL motivational subscale and the microanalysis metacognitive subscale)"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The only significant cross-method correlation within one SRL component is motivation assessed by questionnaire and closed-ended microanalytic questions — related
- When SRL is measured at a fine grain size (specific strategies), self-reports show low calibration with behavioral measures — a broader claim this one bears on
- The SKT-SRL correlates moderately with self-reported SRL strategy usage (convergent validity) — related
- Whether an SRL component correlates with GPA depends on how it is assessed: cognition via a strategy knowledge test, motivation via questionnaire, metacognition via an open-ended microanalytic question — related
- SRL components show moderate correlations within one assessment level but no correlations across different assessment methods within one component — a broader claim this one bears on
- SKT-SRL scores did not correlate significantly with high school GPA in the pilot and validation studies — related
- Measurement methods moderate SRL–EF correlations, with indirect measures correlating higher than direct measures — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
skt-srl-microanalysis-low-correlation |
title |
The SKT-SRL shows low, mostly non-significant correlations with SRL microanalysis (online measure) |
description |
The SKT-SRL shows low, mostly non-significant correlations with SRL microanalysis (online measure) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
recheck_by |
2027 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — laura-dörrenbächer-ulrich-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.