Claims

Small interdisciplinary teamwork was the most widely reported teaching strategy, explicitly reported in 62 articles

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Having students intentionally work together in small interdisciplinary teams was explicitly reported in 62 of the articles, with teams varying from pairs to groups of three to seven students. → Nagel Daniel A. 2024

Evidence

Nagel Daniel A. 2024

Nagel Daniel A., Penner Jamie L., Halas Gayle, Philip Mark T., Cooke Carol A. (2024). Exploring experiential learning within interprofessional practice education initiatives for pre-licensure healthcare students: a scoping review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05114-w

q3 · i? · review · r3

Review synthesis of specific teaching and learning strategies in Part 3. The review reports small interdisciplinary teamwork in 62 articles, with team sizes ranging from pairs to groups of three to seven students.

"Having students intentionally work together in small interdisciplinary teams was explicitly reported in 62 of the articles. Teams varied in size, for example, from pairs [49, 56, 58, 59, 63, 65, 68, 108, 128, 137] to groups of three to seven students [70, 76, 78, 79, 85–87, 100, 102, 106, 115, 116, 121, 129, 140, 148, 149]."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.