Claims

Smart board-supported teaching of the 7th-grade unit 'electricity in our lives' produced higher post-test achievement than the 2005 Science and Technology curriculum

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After four weeks of instruction, the experimental group taught with smart board activities scored significantly higher on the 25-item achievement test than the control group taught per the 2005 curriculum (t=2.431, p=.018). → Aktas 2016

Evidence

Aktas 2016

Aktas, S., & Aydin, A. (2016). The effect of the smart board usage in science and technology lessons. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 64, 125-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2016.64.7

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Control-group quasi-experiment with two intact 7th-grade classes (experimental N=37, control N=38). Post-test means were 19.11 (experimental) versus 16.63 (control); the article reports "a significant difference statistically was found between the achievement scores of the two groups" with t=2.431, p=.018.

"A significant difference statistically was found between the achievement scores of the two groups (t=2.431, p<.05). Therefore, the teaching methods with smart boards used in the experimental group increased the students' success more than the traditional Science and Technology Curriculum applied to the control group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.