Claims

Seventh-graders taught the 'Systems of the Human Body' unit with the simulation method scored significantly higher on the post-test than peers taught by traditional lecture

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Post-test achievement of the simulation-taught experimental group was significantly higher than that of the lecture-taught control group (F=25.160, p<0.05), with Bonferroni correction showing the difference favored the experimental group. → Teke 2015

Evidence

Teke 2015

Teke, H., Dogan, B., & Duran, A. (2015). Influence of the Simulation Method on 7th Grade Students' Achievements in Science and Technology Lessons. International Journal of Research in Education and Science (IJRES), 1(2), 111-118. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1105195

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pretest/post-test control-group quasi-experiment with 35 experimental and 35 control seventh-graders taught for five weeks. The one-way ANOVA on post-test scores gave "F= 25.160, p<0.05"; Bonferroni correction showed the experimental mean (57.08) exceeded the control mean (49.88).

"As is seen in Table 9, there is a statistically significant difference between the access -level test post -test results of the experimental and control groups (F= 25.160, p<0.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.