Students using the sharing mind map system rated its usability significantly higher than students using the traditional mind map system¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Usability satisfaction was significantly greater for the experimental group (Mean=44.29) than the control group (Mean=39.37), t=5.71, p<.001. → Chang 2018

Evidence¶

Chang 2018¶

Chang, Chiu, and Huang. (2018). A Sharing Mind Map-oriented Approach to Enhance Collaborative Mobile Learning With Digital Archiving Systems. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1174044

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent sample t-tests at a 95% confidence level on a 17-item questionnaire (11 usability items) completed by 31 experimental and 30 control students; usability t value was 5.71*** with p <.001.

"The usability score of the experimental group was (Mean=44.29) higher than that of the control group (Mean=39.37), suggesting that satisfaction with the usability of the sharing mind map system was significantly greater than that of the traditional mind map system."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The sharing mind map system was rated significantly higher on interactivity but not on ease of use — related
• Sharing mind map mobile learning with digital archive information improves sixth graders' learning performance compared with traditional learning — related