Claims

The sharing mind map system was rated significantly higher on interactivity but not on ease of use

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Interactivity scores were significantly higher for the experimental group (Mean=13.42) than the control group (Mean=9.10), t=13.64, p<.001. → Chang 2018 q2 i? Ease of use did not differ significantly between groups (experimental Mean=12.77 vs control Mean=12.17; t=1.86, not significant). → Chang 2018 (2)

Evidence

Chang 2018

Chang, Chiu, and Huang. (2018). A Sharing Mind Map-oriented Approach to Enhance Collaborative Mobile Learning With Digital Archiving Systems. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1174044

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent sample t-tests on the interactivity dimension (3 items) of the acceptance questionnaire; Table 1 reports experimental Mean=13.42 (SD=1.232) vs control Mean=9.10 (SD=1.242), t=13.64***, p<.001.

"In terms of interactivity, the score of the experimental group was (Mean=12.77) higher than that of the control group (Mean=12.17)."

Chang 2018 (2)

Chang, Chiu, and Huang. (2018). A Sharing Mind Map-oriented Approach to Enhance Collaborative Mobile Learning With Digital Archiving Systems. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 19(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1174044

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent sample t-test on the ease-of-use dimension (3 items); Table 1 reports t=1.86 with no significance marking, unlike the usability and interactivity rows marked *** p <.001.

"In terms of ease of use, the score of the experimental group was (Mean=12.77) higher than that of the control group (Mean=12.17)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.