Claims

The SMS group's vocabulary scores rose significantly from post-test to delayed post-test four weeks later

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group performed significantly better on the delayed post-test (M=26.78) than on the immediate post-test (M=25.17), t=-2.42, p=.02. → Alemi et al. 2012

Evidence

Alemi et al. 2012

Minoo Alemi, Mohammad Reza Anani Sarab & Zahra Lari. (2012). Successful Learning of Academic Word List via MALL: Mobile Assisted Language Learning. International Education Studies, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n6p99

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Paired-samples t-test comparing the 28 SMS-group students' post-test (M=25.17, SD=5.74) and delayed post-test (M=26.78, SD=5.43) scores after the 16-week experiment. The article reports the group "performed significantly better in the delayed post-test than the post-test."

"the experimental group performed significantly better in the delayed post-test than the post-test (t= -2.42, p= .02)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.