Claims

University freshmen learning academic vocabulary via SMS show no significant short-term advantage over freshmen learning the same words with a dictionary

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? After 16 weeks, the SMS group (M=25.17) and dictionary group (M=22.64) did not differ significantly on the immediate 40-item vocabulary post-test (t=1.48, p=.42). → Alemi et al. 2012

Evidence

Alemi et al. 2012

Minoo Alemi, Mohammad Reza Anani Sarab & Zahra Lari. (2012). Successful Learning of Academic Word List via MALL: Mobile Assisted Language Learning. International Education Studies, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n6p99

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent t-test on immediate post-test scores of 45 non-English-major freshmen at Sharif University of Technology: experimental SMS group (N=28, M=25.17, SD=5.74) vs control dictionary group (N=17, M=22.64, SD=5.18). The study reports "not any significant difference between the experimental and control groups in the post-test."

"The t-test result (t=1.48, p= .42) shows that there was not any significant difference between the experimental and control groups in the post-test."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.