Claims

Vocabulary taught via SMS is retained significantly better in the long term than vocabulary learned with a dictionary

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2012 · checked against its sources 2026-11-02 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? On the delayed post-test four weeks after instruction, the SMS group (M=26.78) significantly outperformed the dictionary group (M=22.09), T=-2.10, p=.04. → Alemi et al. 2012

Evidence

Alemi et al. 2012

Minoo Alemi, Mohammad Reza Anani Sarab & Zahra Lari. (2012). Successful Learning of Academic Word List via MALL: Mobile Assisted Language Learning. International Education Studies, 5(6). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v5n6p99

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Independent t-test on delayed post-test scores of the same 45 freshmen: SMS group (N=28, M=26.78, SD=6.96) vs dictionary group (N=17, M=22.09, SD=5.43). The article reports "a significant difference between the two groups , mean scores in the delayed post-test."

"The results of the t-test (table 6) show that th ere was a significant difference between the two groups , mean scores in the delayed post-test (T= -2.10, p= .04)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.