High, average and low achievers taught with SMTV each significantly outperformed their DMTV counterparts on the retention test¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? High achievers: experimental 72.33 vs control 64.67, t = 2.16, df = 10, p = .055. → Malik Behlol & Hukam Dad 2010 q2 i? Average achievers: experimental 61.38 vs control 51.38, t = 2.92, df = 14, p = .011. → Malik Behlol & Hukam Dad 2010 (2) q2 i? Low achievers: experimental 53.90 vs control 45.20, t = 3.89, df = 18, p = .001. → Malik Behlol & Hukam Dad 2010 (3)

Evidence¶

Malik Behlol & Hukam Dad 2010¶

Malik Behlol & Hukam Dad. (2010). Effectiveness of Structural Method of Teaching Vocabulary. English Language Teaching, 3(3). https://www.ccsenet.org/elt

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Retention-test comparison for high achievers (n = 6 per group). The article reports the difference as significant with t = 2.16, df = 10, p = .055, a value at the edge of the .05 level.

"The means, standard deviations and standard errors of the means of the high achievers of the experimental group was found 72.33 and of the control group was 64.67 on retention test."

Malik Behlol & Hukam Dad 2010 (2)¶

Malik Behlol & Hukam Dad. (2010). Effectiveness of Structural Method of Teaching Vocabulary. English Language Teaching, 3(3). https://www.ccsenet.org/elt

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Retention-test comparison for average achievers (n = 8 per group). t = 2.92, df = 14, p = .011, described as highly significant; the null hypothesis was rejected.

"The mean of the experimental group was found 61.38 and of the control group was 51.38. The standard errors of the means were 3.01 and 1.61 respectively."

Malik Behlol & Hukam Dad 2010 (3)¶

Malik Behlol & Hukam Dad. (2010). Effectiveness of Structural Method of Teaching Vocabulary. English Language Teaching, 3(3). https://www.ccsenet.org/elt

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Retention-test comparison for low achievers (n = 10 per group). t = 3.89, df = 18, p = .001, described as highly significant; the null hypothesis was rejected.

"The means, standard deviations and standard errors of the means of the low achievers of the experimental and control groups on retention test was found 53.90 and of the control group was 45.20."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• High, average and low achievers taught with SMTV each significantly outperformed their DMTV counterparts on the posttest — related
• The SMTV group significantly outperformed the DMTV group on the delayed retention test — a broader claim this one bears on
• Ninth-grade students taught vocabulary with the structural method significantly outperformed students taught with the definitional method on the posttest — related