Claims

The SMTV group significantly outperformed the DMTV group on the delayed retention test

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? On the retention test the experimental group mean (61.00) was significantly higher than the control group mean (52.13), p = .002. → Malik Behlol & Hukam Dad 2010

Evidence

Malik Behlol & Hukam Dad 2010

Malik Behlol & Hukam Dad. (2010). Effectiveness of Structural Method of Teaching Vocabulary. English Language Teaching, 3(3). https://www.ccsenet.org/elt

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Delayed/retention test administered with the same instrument to both groups to cover the interaction of time of measurement and treatment effects. t = 3.22, df = 46, p = .002; the retention null hypothesis was rejected.

"The mean of the experimental group was found 61.00 and that of control group was 52.13. The standard deviations were 9.33 and 9.73 respectively."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.