Ninth-grade students taught vocabulary with the structural method significantly outperformed students taught with the definitional method on the posttest¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The experimental group (SMTV) scored significantly higher than the control group (DMTV) on the posttest (p = .000). → Malik Behlol & Hukam Dad 2010
Evidence¶
Malik Behlol & Hukam Dad 2010¶
Malik Behlol & Hukam Dad. (2010). Effectiveness of Structural Method of Teaching Vocabulary. English Language Teaching, 3(3). https://www.ccsenet.org/elt
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Pretest-posttest control group experiment with 24 students per group, equated on pretest scores by matching. The posttest t test gave t = 3.79, df = 46, p = .000, so the null hypothesis was rejected; means were "66.83 and that of control group was 55.33".
"The mean of the experimental group was found 66.83 and that of control group was 55.33. The standard deviations were 11.09 and 9.86 respectively."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- High, average and low achievers taught with SMTV each significantly outperformed their DMTV counterparts on the posttest — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- High, average and low achievers taught with SMTV each significantly outperformed their DMTV counterparts on the retention test — related
- The SMTV group significantly outperformed the DMTV group on the delayed retention test — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.