Claims

Ninth-grade students taught vocabulary with the structural method significantly outperformed students taught with the definitional method on the posttest

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? The experimental group (SMTV) scored significantly higher than the control group (DMTV) on the posttest (p = .000). → Malik Behlol & Hukam Dad 2010

Evidence

Malik Behlol & Hukam Dad 2010

Malik Behlol & Hukam Dad. (2010). Effectiveness of Structural Method of Teaching Vocabulary. English Language Teaching, 3(3). https://www.ccsenet.org/elt

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Pretest-posttest control group experiment with 24 students per group, equated on pretest scores by matching. The posttest t test gave t = 3.79, df = 46, p = .000, so the null hypothesis was rejected; means were "66.83 and that of control group was 55.33".

"The mean of the experimental group was found 66.83 and that of control group was 55.33. The standard deviations were 11.09 and 9.86 respectively."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.