Social presence shows the strongest association with metacognition in an online case-based course, while teaching presence shows no significant relationship¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Social presence demonstrated the strongest association with both self-regulation and co-regulation, followed by cognitive presence. → Sadaf 2022
q2 i? Teaching presence revealed no statistically significant relationship with metacognition (values of .096 for self-regulation and .228 for co-regulation). → Sadaf 2022
Evidence¶
Sadaf 2022¶
Sadaf, A., Kim, S. Y., & Olesova, L. (2022). Relationship between metacognition and online Community of Inquiry in an online case-based course. Online Learning, 26(4), 79-93. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i4.3474
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Correlational analysis under RQ3 in the survey of 47 graduate students in the online CBI course. The article reports "social presence demonstrated the strongest association with both self-regulation and co-regulation, followed by cognitive presence."
"teaching presence revealed no statistically significant relationship with metacognition with its value of .096 and .228 for self-regulation and co-regulation, respectively"
Studies bearing on this claim¶
In an online community of inquiry, which presences go with learners' regulation and learning? This table gathers the studies behind this claim and the 13 narrower claims that bear on it: 7 distinct studies (3 associational, 2 qualitative, 1 causal, 1 review), q1–q3, 0 of 7 with an effect size coded. One row per study, codes as each entry records them; no effect is averaged and no verdict is drawn. Built by scripts/synthesize_claim.py from eval/synthesis/; a row that looks wrong is fixed on the claim it comes from.
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Metacognition — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Co-regulation shows stronger relationships with the three CoI presences than self-regulation in an online case-based course — related
- In an online case-based course, students perceive cognitive presence as highest and least variable, and teaching presence as the most variable, among the CoI presences and metacognition dimensions — related
- Self-regulation and co-regulation are significantly and highly correlated in an online case-based course — related
- In an online course, student performance can be examined in relationship to measures of student interaction and sense of presence using multiple independent and dependent variables. — related
- Online PBL group interaction follows the scripted sequence initially, but co-regulation derails over time into social bonding with fewer high-cognitive interactions — related
- No single metacognitive self-report can be recommended as the industry standard; the COMEGAM-ro has the strongest statistical support but is unreplicated — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
social-presence-strongest-metacognition-association-cbi |
title |
Social presence shows the strongest association with metacognition in an online case-based course, while teaching presence shows no significant relationship |
description |
Social presence shows the strongest association with metacognition in an online case-based course, while teaching presence shows no significant relationship |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2022 |
source_checked |
2026-10-20 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-26 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — sadaf-2022 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.