The global civic activism measurement model was fully valid with no items removed, appearing valid across contexts¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1–r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: tool and model accuracy changes quickly

Subclaims¶

q2 i? All indicators of the global civic activism model met the outer loading standard, and CR, AVE, cross-loadings, and HTMT criteria were satisfied without any removals. → Nguyen 2021 q2 i? The global civic activism model appeared valid across multiple contexts including this study and prior validations by Morais and Ogden (2011) and Roberts and Wilson (2016). → Nguyen 2021 (2)

Evidence¶

Nguyen 2021¶

Nguyen, M. T. (2021). Validating a Scale for Measuring Students' Perspectives toward Global Citizenship: A Case at a Private University in Vietnam. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(3), 575-587. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.03.362

q2 · i? · the article prints no effect size for this finding · associational · r2

PLS-SEM assessment of the global civic activism model: ICO (CR 0.902, AVE 0.651), PV (CR 0.879, AVE 0.646), GCA (CR 0.811, AVE 0.590); all HTMT figures under 0.85, so the model was valid.

"Lastly, for the measurement model of Global Civic Activism, after examining Outer Factor Loading, all the indicators met the standard; therefore, there was no need to remove any indicators."

Nguyen 2021 (2)¶

Nguyen, M. T. (2021). Validating a Scale for Measuring Students' Perspectives toward Global Citizenship: A Case at a Private University in Vietnam. Education Quarterly Reviews, 4(3), 575-587. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.04.03.362

q2 · i? · the article prints no effect size for this finding · associational · r1

Conclusion-level statement comparing this validation with prior developed-country validations; the article calls this measurement model the most valid one in the study context.

"the model of measuring Global Civic Activism appeared to be valid within many contexts, such as this study or the studies of Morais and Ogden (2011) and Roberts and Wilson (2016)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The original global citizenship scale is employable in a developing-country university context after adjustments to social responsibility and global competence — a broader claim this one bears on
• The social responsibility measurement model required the most item removals, with global justice and personal responsibility items dropped in the Vietnamese context — related
• Only two intercultural communication items (IC1, IC2) were removed from the global competence model, attributed to limited intercultural exposure — related
• The measurement model showed adequate reliability and convergent validity, and BI and UB models showed substantial explanatory power — related
• The survey instrument's nine constructs show convergent and discriminant validity in this sample — reports the opposite
• A formal curriculum that includes citizenship projects and courses also appears to be an effective type of citizenship education — related