Claims

Social science students report higher job finding anxiety and AI anxiety than natural and applied field students, with small effect sizes

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q2 · i1 small
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i1 Social science students had significantly higher job finding anxiety than natural and applied field students (t=4.08, d=.25). → Üstün 2026 q2 i? No significant field difference was found in the Learning subdimension of AI anxiety or in total AI attitudes. → Üstün 2026 (2)

Evidence

Üstün 2026

Üstün, A. G., & Danacıoğlu, N. (2026). The Role of Artificial Intelligence Anxiety and Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence in University Students’ Job Finding Anxiety. Participatory Educational Research, 13(2), 143-164. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.23.13.2

q2 · i1 · associational · r2

Independent samples t-test by field of study in the 1,057-student survey (job finding anxiety t=4.08, p<.001). The study reports social science students "had significantly higher average scores than those in natural and applied fields" with a small effect size, d=.25.

"students in the social sciences had significantly higher average scores than those in natural and applied fields ( p<.05); however, this difference corresponded to a small effect size (d=.25)."

Üstün 2026 (2)

Üstün, A. G., & Danacıoğlu, N. (2026). The Role of Artificial Intelligence Anxiety and Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence in University Students’ Job Finding Anxiety. Participatory Educational Research, 13(2), 143-164. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.23.13.2

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Same field-of-study t-test analysis; the Learning subdimension (t=1.5, p=.135) and total AI attitudes (t=1.05, p=.296) showed no significant difference between fields; equivalence was not tested.

"However, no statistically significant difference was found in the Learning subdimension of the AI Anxiety."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id social-science-students-higher-job-finding-anxiety
title Social science students report higher job finding anxiety and AI anxiety than natural and applied field students, with small effect sizes
description Social science students report higher job finding anxiety and AI anxiety than natural and applied field students, with small effect sizes
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2026
recheck_by 2031
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — üstün-2026, üstün-2026-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.