Social science students report higher job finding anxiety and AI anxiety than natural and applied field students, with small effect sizes¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associationalr2·q2·i1small
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · recheck by 2031: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i1 Social science students had significantly higher job finding anxiety than natural and applied field students (t=4.08, d=.25). → Üstün 2026
q2 i? No significant field difference was found in the Learning subdimension of AI anxiety or in total AI attitudes. → Üstün 2026 (2)
Evidence¶
Üstün 2026¶
Üstün, A. G., & Danacıoğlu, N. (2026). The Role of Artificial Intelligence Anxiety and Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence in University Students’ Job Finding Anxiety. Participatory Educational Research, 13(2), 143-164. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.23.13.2
q2 · i1 · associational · r2
Independent samples t-test by field of study in the 1,057-student survey (job finding anxiety t=4.08, p<.001). The study reports social science students "had significantly higher average scores than those in natural and applied fields" with a small effect size, d=.25.
"students in the social sciences had significantly higher average scores than those in natural and applied fields ( p<.05); however, this difference corresponded to a small effect size (d=.25)."
Üstün 2026 (2)¶
Üstün, A. G., & Danacıoğlu, N. (2026). The Role of Artificial Intelligence Anxiety and Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence in University Students’ Job Finding Anxiety. Participatory Educational Research, 13(2), 143-164. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.26.23.13.2
q2 · i? · associational · r2
Same field-of-study t-test analysis; the Learning subdimension (t=1.5, p=.135) and total AI attitudes (t=1.05, p=.296) showed no significant difference between fields; equivalence was not tested.
"However, no statistically significant difference was found in the Learning subdimension of the AI Anxiety."
Discussion¶
Learner Variables¶
- Academic Anxiety — outcome: instruction changes it
Related Claims¶
- Female students report higher job finding anxiety, AI anxiety, and negative AI attitudes than male students — related
- Second-year students report higher job finding anxiety and AI anxiety than students in other academic years — related
- Age, gender, class level and voluntary programme choice do not significantly predict job search anxiety in the adjusted model — related
- Modality effect sizes differ across fields of study, with social science effects negative and science effects largest — related
- AI anxiety is positively and significantly correlated with job search anxiety among health sciences students — related
- Negative AI attitudes correlate positively with job finding anxiety more strongly than positive AI attitudes — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
social-science-students-higher-job-finding-anxiety |
title |
Social science students report higher job finding anxiety and AI anxiety than natural and applied field students, with small effect sizes |
description |
Social science students report higher job finding anxiety and AI anxiety than natural and applied field students, with small effect sizes |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
recheck_by |
2031 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — üstün-2026, üstün-2026-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.