Claims

The treatment effect on social skills was moderated by a significant Condition × Pretest × State interaction, significant only in State A

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? For SSIS-RS Social Skills, the Condition × Pretest interaction was significant in State A (z = −2.104, p = .035), with a significant condition effect for children in the clinical or borderline range at pretest (SRD = −.277); it was not significant in State B. → Conroy 2018

Evidence

Conroy 2018

Conroy, M. A., Sutherland, K. S., Algina, J., Werch, B., & Ladwig, C. (2018). Prevention and Treatment of Problem Behaviors in Young Children: Clinical Implications From a Randomized Controlled Trial of BEST in CLASS. AERA Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417750376

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Simple-interaction decomposition of the significant three-way Condition × Pretest × State interaction on SSIS-RS Social Skills in the cluster-randomized trial. In State B the simple interaction was not significant, though the condition effect there was significant (SRD = −.161).

"A simple interaction analysis resulted in a significant Condition × Pretest interaction for State A (z = −2.104, p = .035), with a significant condition effect for children in the clinical or borderline range at pretest (z = −3.112, p = .002, SRD = −.277)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.