Claims

BEST in CLASS reduced the percentage of children in the clinical or borderline range on all three C-TRF problem-behavior subscales

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The condition effect was significant and negative for Externalizing, Internalizing, and Total Problems, with averaged SRDs of −.119, −.194, and −.173. → Conroy 2018

Evidence

Conroy 2018

Conroy, M. A., Sutherland, K. S., Algina, J., Werch, B., & Ladwig, C. (2018). Prevention and Treatment of Problem Behaviors in Young Children: Clinical Implications From a Randomized Controlled Trial of BEST in CLASS. AERA Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417750376

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Logistic regression analysis of posttest status from a multisite cluster-randomized trial (230 treatment, 232 comparison children). The article reports the condition effect was "significant and negative" on all three C-TRF subscales, with SRD effect sizes of −.119, −.194, and −.173 for Externalizing, Internalizing, and Total Problems.

"For all three C-TRF subscales, the effect of condition was significant and negative, indicating that the BEST in CLASS intervention reduced the percentage of children in the clinical or borderline range."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.