Claims

Treatment reduced the percentage of children in the clinical or borderline range on the SSIS-RS Problem Behavior subscale (SRD = −.186)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The condition estimate was negative and significant for SSIS-RS Problem Behavior, indicating treatment reduced the percentage of children in the clinical or borderline range. → Conroy 2018

Evidence

Conroy 2018

Conroy, M. A., Sutherland, K. S., Algina, J., Werch, B., & Ladwig, C. (2018). Prevention and Treatment of Problem Behaviors in Young Children: Clinical Implications From a Randomized Controlled Trial of BEST in CLASS. AERA Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858417750376

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Logistic regression on SSIS-RS Problem Behavior posttest status in the cluster-randomized trial. The article reports the condition estimate was "negative and significant" with SRD = −.186; the corresponding Social Skills main effect was not significant (p = .109).

"The condition estimate was negative and significant for Problem Behavior, indicating that treatment reduced the percentage of children in the clinical or borderline range (SRD = −.186)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.