Trainer interview findings support the sociocultural framing of the IVR safety training model, including the social setting around individual IVR scenarios¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? The trainers' practices demonstrated awareness of learning context and learner factors, confirming the importance of including the social setting in the pedagogical model, with introduction and debriefing phases enacting social learning. → Lehikko 2025

Evidence¶

Lehikko 2025¶

Lehikko, A., Nykänen, M., & Ruokamo, H. (2025). Conceptualizing a pedagogical model for immersive virtual reality safety training: pedagogical practices in trainer interviews. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10490-1

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Synthesis of the interview findings with research literature addressing RQ 2 (sociocultural contextualization of the model). The trainers acted as mediators connecting training to learners' current work and previous experiences, and the authors place emphasis on trainer-facilitated reflection in the debriefing phase to support training transfer.

"Our findings confirm the importance of including the social setting in the pedagogical model for IVR safety training. The introduction and debriefing phases enact social learning; the learners are engaged in small-group discussions and interactions"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Safety trainers guide social interaction in training situations by facilitating interaction and maintaining temporal structure — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
• Safety trainers utilize organizational social and material resources for training development — related
• Safety trainers match pedagogy to training goals by ensuring relevance, selecting delivery methods, and evaluating outcomes — related